PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTAIX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
3.23%13.49%8.39%15.59%-14.49%9.25%12.07%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
1.84%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.22%28.08%24.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTAIX achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than CRDBX's 1.84% return.


GTAIX

1D
1.46%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
3.23%
6M
5.17%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*

CRDBX

1D
4.87%
1M
4.80%
YTD
1.84%
6M
8.34%
1Y
36.76%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTAIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GTAIX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTAIX
GTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTAIXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.76

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

3.26

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.61

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

5.17

-3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.15

16.62

-6.46

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTAIX and CRDBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTAIXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.76

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.01

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.01

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between GTAIX and CRDBX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

GTAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than CRDBX's 15.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
5.34%5.82%3.38%2.69%1.65%2.35%0.82%1.77%1.92%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
15.08%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTAIX drawdown since its inception was -24.25%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTAIX and CRDBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GTAIXCRDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.25%

-97.00%

+72.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-7.13%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.43%

-97.00%

+77.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-95.71%

+92.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-25.67%

+20.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.22%

-0.47%

Volatility

GTAIX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) is 3.63%, while Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that GTAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GTAIXCRDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

5.18%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

10.66%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

21.01%

-9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.72%

1,635.86%

-1,625.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.54%

1,525.82%

-1,514.28%