MGINX vs. GPIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX).
MGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 14, 1995. GPIFX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | -1.25% | 14.73% | 3.56% | 9.15% | -6.87% | 6.36% | 2.26% | 12.61% | 0.33% | 13.65% |
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund | -0.45% | 3.69% | 4.22% | 7.13% | -14.14% | 1.17% | 15.17% | 6.64% | -2.48% | 6.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGINX achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than GPIFX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MGINX has outperformed GPIFX with an annualized return of 5.73%, while GPIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.
MGINX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 10.33%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
GPIFX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGINX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIFX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGINX vs. GPIFX — Risk / Return Rank
MGINX
GPIFX
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGINX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 0.86 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 1.09 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.66 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 1.88 | +5.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGINX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 0.86 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.05 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.50 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.43 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGINX and GPIFX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Dividend Comparison
MGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than GPIFX's 4.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGINX DWS Global Macro Fund | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.88% | 4.76% | 1.20% | 0.81% | 3.23% | 6.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund | 4.69% | 5.15% | 5.18% | 4.86% | 1.96% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 3.73% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 1.97% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGINX drawdown since its inception was -63.39%, which is greater than GPIFX's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGINX and GPIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGINX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.39% | -16.72% | -46.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -3.50% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.16% | -16.72% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.12% | -16.72% | +1.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -2.79% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -4.07% | -9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.24% | +0.29% |
Volatility
MGINX vs. GPIFX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Global Macro Fund (MGINX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) at 1.29%. This indicates that MGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGINX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 1.29% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.67% | 1.75% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 2.73% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.63% | 4.78% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.49% | 5.31% | +2.18% |