MGHYX vs. FQTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX).
MGHYX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Mar 16, 1998. FQTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2019.
Performance
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund | -0.34% | 9.82% | 6.99% | 11.17% | -11.67% | 3.22% | 6.83% | 7.86% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 1.02% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGHYX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 1.02% return.
MGHYX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGHYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGHYX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGHYX
FQTIX
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGHYX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 2.68 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 3.64 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.64 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 4.19 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 18.41 | -6.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGHYX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.68 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.63 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.56 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGHYX and FQTIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison
MGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, more than FQTIX's 7.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund | 7.33% | 7.17% | 5.58% | 4.35% | 5.81% | 4.20% | 5.81% | 5.63% | 6.96% | 3.76% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 7.00% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHYX and FQTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGHYX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -24.62% | -28.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -2.41% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.93% | -18.81% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.47% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -4.42% | -19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.55% | +0.16% |
Volatility
MGHYX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) is 1.45%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that MGHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGHYX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 1.68% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 2.43% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 3.87% | +0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 5.93% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 7.80% | -1.90% |