PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGHAX vs. EPLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund (EPLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGHAX achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than EPLCX's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHAX has underperformed EPLCX with an annualized return of 6.45%, while EPLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.


MGHAX

1D
0.12%
1M
2.28%
YTD
2.52%
6M
2.90%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
6.45%

EPLCX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.03%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.00%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
11.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGHAX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund
2.52%13.27%6.74%13.27%9.23%-4.88%2.97%15.49%-6.88%11.33%
EPLCX
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund
13.75%14.03%18.42%8.83%-2.56%22.98%0.24%23.98%-5.37%16.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MGHAX and EPLCX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGHAX vs. EPLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGHAX
MGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EPLCX
EPLCX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EPLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EPLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund (EPLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGHAXEPLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.46

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

4.01

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

15.76

-5.10

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the EPLCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGHAX and EPLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGHAX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, smaller than the maximum EPLCX drawdown of -35.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHAX and EPLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGHAXEPLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-35.85%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-6.37%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.87%

-14.25%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.50%

-16.12%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.61%

-35.85%

+6.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.16%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-3.53%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.62%

-0.45%

Volatility

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) is 1.46%, while MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund (EPLCX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that MGHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGHAXEPLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

3.18%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.99%

7.58%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

10.02%

-5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

13.50%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.52%

15.68%

-3.16%

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EPLCX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGHAX vs. EPLCX - Dividend Comparison

MGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, less than EPLCX's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPLCX
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund
6.46%7.30%10.72%5.56%3.83%1.90%2.36%4.00%5.75%5.55%1.98%6.59%
MGHAX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund
6.36%6.49%7.62%5.95%31.14%5.06%5.54%4.24%4.96%4.18%5.29%6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGHAX and EPLCX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPLCX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to MGHAX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHAX dropped -33.23% vs EPLCX's -35.85%.

MGHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGHAX and EPLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer