MGHAX vs. MSXAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MGHAX (MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund) and MSXAX (NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A) are both mutual funds - MGHAX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by New York Life, while MSXAX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MGHAX returned 6.54%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for MSXAX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGHAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for MSXAX.

Performance

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGHAX achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than MSXAX's 11.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHAX has underperformed MSXAX with an annualized return of 6.54%, while MSXAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.

MGHAX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 12.91%
• 3Y*: 11.32%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 6.54%

MSXAX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 5.75%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 6M: 11.44%
• 1Y: 28.32%
• 3Y*: 22.12%
• 5Y*: 13.71%
• 10Y*: 15.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGHAX MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund	2.02%	13.27%	6.74%	13.27%	9.23%	-4.88%	2.97%	15.49%	-6.88%	11.33%
MSXAX NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A	11.46%	17.26%	23.98%	25.96%	-18.52%	28.13%	17.86%	30.69%	-4.71%	21.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MGHAX and MSXAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004	0.31

The correlation between MGHAX and MSXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MGHAX vs. MSXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGHAX

MGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 75
MGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MSXAX

MSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
MSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MGHAX	MSXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.47	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.56	3.36	+1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.45	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	3.27	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	15.18	-3.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the MSXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGHAX and MSXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MGHAX	MSXAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.47	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.82	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.84	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.56	+0.17

Drawdowns

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGHAX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, smaller than the maximum MSXAX drawdown of -55.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHAX and MSXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGHAX	MSXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.23%	-55.48%	+22.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.70%	-8.97%	+4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.87%	-18.78%	+11.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.50%	-24.78%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.61%	-33.79%	+4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-7.17%	+2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	1.92%	-0.75%

Volatility

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) is 1.73%, while NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that MGHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGHAX	MSXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	2.83%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.85%	8.99%	-5.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.68%	11.87%	-7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	16.91%	-1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.52%	18.07%	-5.55%

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MSXAX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGHAX vs. MSXAX - Dividend Comparison

MGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than MSXAX's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGHAX MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund	6.40%	6.49%	7.62%	5.95%	31.14%	5.06%	5.54%	4.24%	4.96%	4.18%	5.29%	6.11%
MSXAX NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A	0.95%	1.06%	5.20%	4.04%	10.30%	4.44%	8.78%	17.42%	14.49%	15.18%	9.63%	5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGHAX and MSXAX in my portfolio?

MGHAX and MSXAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGHAX or MSXAX?

MSXAX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to MGHAX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHAX dropped -33.23% vs MSXAX's -55.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.