PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGHAX vs. DLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGHAX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than DLENX's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHAX has outperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 5.76%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.19% annualized return.


MGHAX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.36%
6M
-0.30%
YTD
0.66%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
5.76%
ALL TIME*
7.16%

DLENX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.55%
6M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
3.19%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGHAX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund
0.66%13.27%6.74%13.27%9.23%-4.88%2.97%15.49%-6.88%11.33%
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
0.87%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MGHAX and DLENX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.69

The correlation between MGHAX and DLENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGHAX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MGHAX
MGHAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MGHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MGHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGHAXDLENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.98

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

7.44

-1.29

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the DLENX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGHAX and DLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGHAX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, which is greater than DLENX's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHAX and DLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGHAXDLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-25.64%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-1.83%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-4.35%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.50%

-25.64%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.61%

-25.64%

-3.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.84%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-3.58%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

0.49%

+0.74%

Volatility

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MGHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.56%. This indicates that MGHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGHAXDLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.56%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.92%

1.55%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

1.98%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

4.54%

+11.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

4.64%

+7.87%

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGHAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGHAX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison

MGHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than DLENX's 4.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
4.86%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
MGHAX
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.94%6.49%7.62%5.95%31.14%5.06%5.54%4.24%4.96%4.18%5.29%6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGHAX and DLENX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGHAX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to DLENX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGHAX dropped -33.23% vs DLENX's -25.64%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGHAX and DLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer