PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGFIX vs. TMDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) and AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGFIX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than TMDIX's 5.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MGFIX has underperformed TMDIX with an annualized return of 1.39%, while TMDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.


MGFIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.68%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
1.39%

TMDIX

1D
0.80%
1M
5.57%
YTD
5.07%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
-3.03%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
13.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGFIX
AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund
0.44%7.26%1.50%6.69%-13.17%-9.68%7.34%11.11%-1.82%6.78%
TMDIX
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund
5.07%-1.76%10.84%25.07%-22.26%16.75%33.42%63.26%-4.28%22.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MGFIX and TMDIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2005

0.05

Over the past year, MGFIX and TMDIX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGFIX vs. TMDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGFIX
MGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

TMDIX
TMDIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TMDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) and AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGFIXTMDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.00

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

-0.08

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

-0.17

+5.98

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the TMDIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGFIX and TMDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGFIXTMDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

-0.11

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.23

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.62

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.54

+0.31

Drawdowns

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGFIX drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum TMDIX drawdown of -48.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFIX and TMDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGFIXTMDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-48.73%

+23.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-25.45%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.75%

-25.45%

+18.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.68%

-30.53%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

-35.44%

+10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

-12.03%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-7.15%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

12.08%

-11.12%

Volatility

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) is 1.36%, while AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMDIX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that MGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGFIXTMDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

3.92%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

17.14%

-14.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

19.56%

-15.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

20.38%

-14.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

21.08%

-15.84%

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGFIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than TMDIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGFIX vs. TMDIX - Dividend Comparison

MGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while TMDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGFIX
AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund
4.07%3.85%3.56%2.94%2.41%2.21%3.38%4.20%3.89%3.81%4.96%4.17%
TMDIX
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%8.08%3.98%3.69%29.72%18.28%31.06%16.38%14.44%5.90%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGFIX and TMDIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMDIX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to MGFIX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGFIX dropped -25.03% vs TMDIX's -48.73%.

MGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGFIX and TMDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer