MGFIX vs. HOBIX
MGFIX (AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund) and HOBIX (Holbrook Income Fund Class I) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MGFIX returned 0.05%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for HOBIX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGFIX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for HOBIX.
Performance
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGFIX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than HOBIX's 2.43% return.
MGFIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
HOBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- —
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 0.44% | 7.26% | 1.50% | 6.69% | -13.17% | -9.68% | 7.34% | 11.11% | -1.82% | 6.74% |
HOBIX Holbrook Income Fund Class I | 2.43% | 7.67% | 7.66% | 5.65% | -2.91% | 6.13% | 7.45% | 7.70% | 1.74% | 2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGFIX and HOBIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGFIX vs. HOBIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGFIX
HOBIX
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) and Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGFIX | HOBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 5.19 | -3.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 13.02 | -11.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.81 | 45.38 | -39.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGFIX | HOBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 3.31 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 1.64 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGFIX drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, which is greater than HOBIX's maximum drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGFIX and HOBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGFIX | HOBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -23.52% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -0.51% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -2.77% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | -4.16% | -15.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | 0.00% | -8.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -0.97% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.15% | +0.81% |
Volatility
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Volatility Comparison
AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund (MGFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that MGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGFIX | HOBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 0.53% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.71% | 1.59% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 2.01% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 2.65% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 5.73% | -0.49% |
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGFIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HOBIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MGFIX vs. HOBIX - Dividend Comparison
MGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than HOBIX's 6.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOBIX Holbrook Income Fund Class I | 6.29% | 6.45% | 7.04% | 6.35% | 5.31% | 3.97% | 6.30% | 3.51% | 4.32% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGFIX AMG GW&K ESG Bond Fund | 4.07% | 3.85% | 3.56% | 2.94% | 2.41% | 2.21% | 3.38% | 4.20% | 3.89% | 3.81% | 4.96% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGFIX and HOBIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGFIX has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to HOBIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGFIX dropped -25.03% vs HOBIX's -23.52%.
HOBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGFIX and HOBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer