PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGCI.L vs. BATS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in M&G Credit Income Investment Trust plc (MGCI.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGCI.L achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than BATS.L's 6.00% return.


MGCI.L

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.67%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.79%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
8.71%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*

BATS.L

1D
1.94%
1M
0.32%
YTD
6.00%
6M
5.80%
1Y
33.89%
3Y*
28.98%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MGCI.L
M&G Credit Income Investment Trust plc
-0.27%7.01%15.73%8.47%-2.69%13.13%-9.61%5.51%-0.10%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
6.00%56.35%37.24%-23.51%28.17%9.10%-9.61%38.29%-9.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MGCI.L and BATS.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.07

Fundamentals

EPS

MGCI.L:

£0.06

BATS.L:

£4.91

PE Ratio

MGCI.L:

16.46

BATS.L:

8.97

PEG Ratio

MGCI.L:

0.56

BATS.L:

0.33

PS Ratio

MGCI.L:

13.52

BATS.L:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

MGCI.L:

£10.90M

BATS.L:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MGCI.L:

£10.90M

BATS.L:

£35.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

MGCI.L:

£0.00

BATS.L:

£17.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGCI.L
MGCI.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MGCI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGCI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGCI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MGCI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGCI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M&G Credit Income Investment Trust plc (MGCI.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGCI.LBATS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

2.46

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

5.98

-4.25

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGCI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the BATS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGCI.L and BATS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGCI.LBATS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

1.49

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.91

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.40

-0.19

Drawdowns

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGCI.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum BATS.L drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGCI.L and BATS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCI.LBATS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-54.44%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-13.70%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.60%

-14.78%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.68%

-29.68%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-11.25%

+9.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-15.17%

+11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.65%

-3.70%

Volatility

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for M&G Credit Income Investment Trust plc (MGCI.L) is 5.82%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that MGCI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCI.LBATS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

10.27%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

18.24%

-7.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

22.87%

-11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

20.56%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

23.91%

-1.82%

Dividends

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison

MGCI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than BATS.L's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.48%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%
MGCI.L
M&G Credit Income Investment Trust plc
8.09%8.26%8.88%9.03%5.10%4.23%4.33%1.97%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MGCI.L vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M&G Credit Income Investment Trust plc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.73M
13.54B
(MGCI.L) Total Revenue
(BATS.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MGCI.L and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGCI.L and BATS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer