PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGBLX vs. PRSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGBLX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MGBLX has underperformed PRSNX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while PRSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.89% annualized return.


MGBLX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.60%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.57%

PRSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.72%
6M
2.83%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
3.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGBLX
MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2
0.31%5.38%1.81%7.69%-11.57%-3.48%10.52%7.91%-2.66%7.22%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.72%9.31%5.60%12.77%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MGBLX and PRSNX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.60

The correlation between MGBLX and PRSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGBLX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGBLX
MGBLX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MGBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MGBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGBLXPRSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.65

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

3.55

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

15.95

-12.42

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the PRSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGBLX and PRSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGBLXPRSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.69

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.48

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.95

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.43

-1.14

Drawdowns

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGBLX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum PRSNX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGBLX and PRSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGBLXPRSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-19.70%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-2.18%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.74%

-2.87%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

-19.70%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

-19.70%

+0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.20%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-2.36%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.48%

+0.59%

Volatility

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 0.83%. This indicates that MGBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGBLXPRSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

0.83%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

2.31%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

2.88%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.29%

4.30%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

4.13%

+0.52%

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGBLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGBLX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison

MGBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than PRSNX's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGBLX
MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2
4.25%4.01%2.53%1.55%2.99%4.72%3.15%1.81%1.66%1.08%1.15%1.63%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
6.64%7.87%6.36%5.08%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGBLX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGBLX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to PRSNX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGBLX dropped -18.71% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGBLX and PRSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer