MGBLX vs. DFGFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MGBLX (MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2) and DFGFX (DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MGBLX returned 1.53%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for DFGFX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MGBLX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DFGFX.

Performance

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGBLX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than DFGFX's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MGBLX has underperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.82% annualized return.

MGBLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

DFGFX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 2.64%
• 3Y*: 4.33%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: 1.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGBLX MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2	0.68%	5.38%	1.81%	7.69%	-11.57%	-3.48%	10.52%	7.91%	-2.66%	7.22%
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio	1.80%	2.89%	5.36%	4.95%	-2.62%	-0.37%	0.88%	2.87%	1.91%	0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MGBLX and DFGFX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010	0.25

The correlation between MGBLX and DFGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MGBLX vs. DFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGBLX

MGBLX Risk / Return Rank: 18
MGBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MGBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MGBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MGBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
MGBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

DFGFX

DFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 43
DFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
DFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
DFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGBLX	DFGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.68	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.84	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.29	-1.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	1.89	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	5.81	-2.17

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGBLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the DFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGBLX and DFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGBLX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGBLX and DFGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGBLX	DFGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.71%	-4.00%	-14.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.25%	-1.41%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.74%	-2.12%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.10%	-4.00%	-13.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.71%	-4.00%	-14.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	0.00%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-0.23%	-6.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	0.46%	+0.65%

Volatility

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2 (MGBLX) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.25%. This indicates that MGBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGBLX	DFGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	0.25%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	0.54%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.41%	1.59%	+1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.30%	1.81%	+2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.65%	1.36%	+3.29%

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGBLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGFX's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGBLX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison

MGBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than DFGFX's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio	3.09%	2.67%	4.77%	3.19%	1.17%	0.23%	0.57%	2.24%	2.21%	1.54%	0.65%	0.02%
MGBLX MFS Global Opportunistic Bond Fund Class R2	4.24%	4.01%	2.53%	1.55%	2.99%	4.72%	3.15%	1.81%	1.66%	1.08%	1.15%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGBLX and DFGFX in my portfolio?

MGBLX and DFGFX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGBLX or DFGFX?

MGBLX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to DFGFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGBLX dropped -18.71% vs DFGFX's -4.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.