PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MG vs. AIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MG vs. AIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) and Arteris, Inc. (AIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MG achieves a 50.75% return, which is significantly lower than AIP's 165.94% return.


MG

1D
1.76%
1M
10.36%
YTD
50.75%
6M
44.58%
1Y
148.31%
3Y*
38.87%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
-2.27%

AIP

1D
-7.37%
1M
13.62%
YTD
165.94%
6M
155.07%
1Y
374.34%
3Y*
84.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MG vs. AIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MG
Mistras Group, Inc.
50.75%39.62%23.77%48.48%-33.65%-20.79%
AIP
Arteris, Inc.
165.94%52.11%73.01%36.98%-79.63%27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MG and AIP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MG:

$622.73M

AIP:

$1.88B

EPS

MG:

$0.70

AIP:

-$0.80

PS Ratio

MG:

0.84

AIP:

23.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

MG:

$731.44M

AIP:

$76.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MG:

$197.97M

AIP:

$68.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

MG:

$75.89M

AIP:

-$31.26M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MG vs. AIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MG
MG Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MG Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AIP
AIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MG vs. AIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) and Arteris, Inc. (AIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGAIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.52

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.26

11.12

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.80

23.33

+6.47

MG vs. AIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MG Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is comparable to the AIP Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MG and AIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MG vs. AIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MG drawdown since its inception was -89.21%, roughly equal to the maximum AIP drawdown of -87.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MG and AIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGAIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.21%

-87.63%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-33.92%

+19.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-54.48%

+13.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.27%

-7.37%

-21.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-62.87%

+22.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

16.14%

-11.14%

Volatility

MG vs. AIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) is 11.57%, while Arteris, Inc. (AIP) has a volatility of 22.85%. This indicates that MG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGAIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.57%

22.85%

-11.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.54%

47.69%

-23.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.95%

88.66%

-46.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.06%

80.51%

-34.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.33%

80.51%

-29.18%

Dividends

MG vs. AIP - Dividend Comparison

Neither MG nor AIP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MG vs. AIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mistras Group, Inc. and Arteris, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
169.03M
22.94M
(MG) Total Revenue
(AIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MG vs. AIP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mistras Group, Inc. and Arteris, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
26.5%
85.8%
Portfolio components
MG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mistras Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.73M and revenue of 169.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.

AIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arteris, Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.69M and revenue of 22.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.8%.

MG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mistras Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 169.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

AIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arteris, Inc. reported an operating income of -9.30M and revenue of 22.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.

MG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mistras Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.39M and revenue of 169.03M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

AIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arteris, Inc. reported a net income of -7.96M and revenue of 22.94M, resulting in a net margin of -34.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MG and AIP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIP has higher volatility (22.85%) compared to MG (11.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MG dropped -89.21% vs AIP's -87.63%.

AIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 3.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MG and AIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer