AIP vs. NBTX
AIP (Arteris, Inc.) and NBTX (Nanobiotix S.A.) are both stocks. AIP operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while NBTX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, AIP returned 89.49%/yr vs 85.89%/yr for NBTX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AIP vs. NBTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIP achieves a 187.10% return, which is significantly higher than NBTX's 52.38% return.
AIP
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 22.66%
- YTD
- 187.10%
- 6M
- 170.68%
- 1Y
- 437.44%
- 3Y*
- 89.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBTX
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -14.09%
- YTD
- 52.38%
- 6M
- 53.98%
- 1Y
- 688.14%
- 3Y*
- 85.89%
- 5Y*
- 19.56%
- 10Y*
- —
AIP vs. NBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIP Arteris, Inc. | 187.10% | 52.11% | 73.01% | 36.98% | -79.63% | 27.86% |
NBTX Nanobiotix S.A. | 52.38% | 705.57% | -60.58% | 98.37% | -54.69% | -31.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIP and NBTX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between AIP and NBTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AIP:
-$0.80
NBTX:
-€1.80
AIP:
25.12
NBTX:
30.49
AIP:
$76.98M
NBTX:
€47.94M
AIP:
$68.36M
NBTX:
€47.94M
AIP:
-$31.26M
NBTX:
-€55.82M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIP vs. NBTX — Risk / Return Rank
AIP
NBTX
AIP vs. NBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arteris, Inc. (AIP) and Nanobiotix S.A. (NBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIP | NBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.55 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.00 | 13.82 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.28 | 32.01 | -4.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIP vs. NBTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIP drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, roughly equal to the maximum NBTX drawdown of -89.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIP and NBTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIP | NBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.63% | -89.94% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.92% | -50.25% | +16.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.48% | -73.88% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -86.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.03% | +36.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -57.32% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 21.66% | -5.52% |
Volatility
AIP vs. NBTX - Volatility Comparison
Arteris, Inc. (AIP) has a higher volatility of 21.18% compared to Nanobiotix S.A. (NBTX) at 15.64%. This indicates that AIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIP | NBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.18% | 15.64% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.94% | 64.77% | -17.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.46% | 108.20% | -19.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.47% | 136.77% | -56.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.47% | 131.33% | -50.86% |
Dividends
AIP vs. NBTX - Dividend Comparison
Neither AIP nor NBTX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AIP vs. NBTX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arteris, Inc. and Nanobiotix S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AIP and NBTX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIP has higher volatility (21.18%) compared to NBTX (15.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIP dropped -87.63% vs NBTX's -89.94%.
NBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.43 vs 5.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIP and NBTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer