PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFWTX vs. MEIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFWTX achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than MEIKX's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MFWTX has underperformed MEIKX with an annualized return of 6.27%, while MEIKX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


MFWTX

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.22%
YTD
4.90%
6M
6.21%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
6.27%

MEIKX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
4.09%
6M
5.41%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFWTX
MFS Global Total Return Fund
4.90%15.48%3.92%10.29%-10.86%8.31%9.35%18.25%-7.19%14.77%
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
4.09%13.37%11.98%8.32%-5.92%25.59%4.09%30.18%-9.81%17.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MFWTX and MEIKX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.85

The correlation between MFWTX and MEIKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFWTX vs. MEIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFWTX
MFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MEIKX
MEIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MEIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MEIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFWTXMEIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.21

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.87

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

6.48

+0.72

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the MEIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFWTX and MEIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFWTXMEIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.22

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.40

+0.44

Drawdowns

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFWTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum MEIKX drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFWTX and MEIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFWTXMEIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.22%

-56.81%

+23.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-6.76%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.68%

-13.15%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.36%

-17.50%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.37%

-36.68%

+13.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-2.20%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-9.45%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.95%

-0.06%

Volatility

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) is 2.11%, while MFS Value Fund (MEIKX) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that MFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFWTXMEIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

2.24%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

7.70%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

10.38%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.13%

13.91%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.62%

16.55%

-6.93%

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFWTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MEIKX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFWTX vs. MEIKX - Dividend Comparison

MFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, less than MEIKX's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEIKX
MFS Value Fund
9.54%9.72%9.49%8.58%7.77%3.43%2.75%3.28%3.76%4.14%3.84%6.12%
MFWTX
MFS Global Total Return Fund
8.02%8.42%8.94%3.69%2.64%10.29%7.20%4.41%3.33%2.17%1.13%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFWTX and MEIKX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEIKX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to MFWTX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFWTX dropped -33.22% vs MEIKX's -56.81%.

MFWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFWTX and MEIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer