PortfoliosLab logo
MFWTX vs. CAIBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MFWTX and CAIBX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MFWTX vs. CAIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MFWTX:

0.90

CAIBX:

1.55

Sortino Ratio

MFWTX:

1.51

CAIBX:

2.24

Omega Ratio

MFWTX:

1.21

CAIBX:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

MFWTX:

1.13

CAIBX:

1.98

Martin Ratio

MFWTX:

3.71

CAIBX:

9.79

Ulcer Index

MFWTX:

2.55%

CAIBX:

1.80%

Daily Std Dev

MFWTX:

8.88%

CAIBX:

10.56%

Max Drawdown

MFWTX:

-33.14%

CAIBX:

-41.42%

Current Drawdown

MFWTX:

0.00%

CAIBX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFWTX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than CAIBX's 9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MFWTX has underperformed CAIBX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while CAIBX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.35% annualized return.


MFWTX

YTD

7.05%

1M

2.35%

6M

2.96%

1Y

7.94%

3Y*

6.23%

5Y*

6.15%

10Y*

5.40%

CAIBX

YTD

9.38%

1M

2.81%

6M

6.97%

1Y

16.18%

3Y*

8.40%

5Y*

9.13%

10Y*

6.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFS Global Total Return Fund

MFWTX vs. CAIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFWTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CAIBX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MFWTX vs. CAIBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFWTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MFWTX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MFWTX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MFWTX is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MFWTX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MFWTX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MFWTX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

CAIBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAIBX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAIBX is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAIBX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAIBX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAIBX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAIBX is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MFWTX vs. CAIBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the CAIBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFWTX and CAIBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MFWTX vs. CAIBX - Dividend Comparison

MFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than CAIBX's 5.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MFWTX
MFS Global Total Return Fund
8.23%8.94%3.68%2.64%10.30%7.19%4.40%3.33%2.49%1.13%4.29%3.17%
CAIBX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A
5.32%5.76%3.47%3.43%3.14%3.38%4.24%3.80%4.68%3.52%3.62%4.67%

Drawdowns

MFWTX vs. CAIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFWTX drawdown since its inception was -33.14%, smaller than the maximum CAIBX drawdown of -41.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFWTX and CAIBX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MFWTX vs. CAIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) is 1.98%, while American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that MFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...