PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFWTX vs. MIGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFWTX achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than MIGFX's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MFWTX has underperformed MIGFX with an annualized return of 6.44%, while MIGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.


MFWTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
4.62%
6M
4.44%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
6.44%

MIGFX

1D
-1.19%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-4.92%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFWTX
MFS Global Total Return Fund
4.62%15.48%3.92%10.29%-10.86%8.31%9.35%18.25%-7.19%14.77%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-4.19%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MFWTX and MIGFX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1990

0.70

The correlation between MFWTX and MIGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFWTX vs. MIGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFWTX
MFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFWTXMIGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.09

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

0.45

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.93

1.45

+5.48

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFWTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the MIGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFWTX and MIGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFWTX drawdown since its inception was -33.22%, smaller than the maximum MIGFX drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFWTX and MIGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFWTXMIGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.22%

-61.83%

+28.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-13.77%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.68%

-18.68%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.36%

-26.67%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.37%

-32.42%

+9.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-6.18%

+4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-18.94%

+15.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

4.27%

-2.37%

Volatility

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Global Total Return Fund (MFWTX) is 2.21%, while MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that MFWTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFWTXMIGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

4.89%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

10.69%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.58%

13.21%

-5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

17.61%

-8.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.63%

18.26%

-8.63%

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFWTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MIGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFWTX vs. MIGFX - Dividend Comparison

MFWTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.04%, less than MIGFX's 11.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFWTX
MFS Global Total Return Fund
8.04%8.42%8.94%3.69%2.64%10.29%7.20%4.41%3.33%2.17%1.13%4.29%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
11.89%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFWTX and MIGFX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIGFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to MFWTX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFWTX dropped -33.22% vs MIGFX's -61.83%.

MFWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFWTX and MIGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer