MFWIX vs. AGOCX
MFWIX (MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I) and AGOCX (PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MFWIX returned 6.64%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for AGOCX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFWIX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for AGOCX.
Performance
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFWIX achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than AGOCX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MFWIX has underperformed AGOCX with an annualized return of 6.64%, while AGOCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.
MFWIX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
AGOCX
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 18.43%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 32.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 4.23% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
AGOCX PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund | 18.43% | 23.91% | 13.75% | 9.41% | -11.69% | 20.27% | 5.72% | 21.02% | -7.69% | 14.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFWIX and AGOCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MFWIX and AGOCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFWIX vs. AGOCX — Risk / Return Rank
MFWIX
AGOCX
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) and PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFWIX | AGOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.04 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 16.23 | -9.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFWIX drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, smaller than the maximum AGOCX drawdown of -51.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFWIX and AGOCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFWIX | AGOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.01% | -51.84% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.73% | -8.25% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.63% | -11.60% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.22% | -24.53% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.36% | -34.69% | +11.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -1.46% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -7.85% | +4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.05% | -0.14% |
Volatility
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) is 2.26%, while PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund (AGOCX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that MFWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFWIX | AGOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 5.08% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 10.83% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.57% | 12.58% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.16% | 14.13% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 15.91% | -6.32% |
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFWIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than AGOCX's 1.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFWIX vs. AGOCX - Dividend Comparison
MFWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than AGOCX's 8.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGOCX PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income Fund | 8.04% | 9.59% | 10.04% | 9.74% | 9.10% | 5.29% | 9.25% | 12.44% | 23.46% | 5.31% | 1.56% | 12.12% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.41% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFWIX and AGOCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGOCX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to MFWIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFWIX dropped -33.01% vs AGOCX's -51.84%.
AGOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFWIX and AGOCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer