PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUL vs. OCIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFUL vs. OCIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFUL vs. OCIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
-0.53%4.51%5.36%2.24%-12.46%-1.61%
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
-1.52%12.68%12.76%12.03%-12.49%1.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUL achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than OCIO's -1.52% return.


MFUL

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
10Y*

OCIO

1D
2.14%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
-1.52%
6M
0.60%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFUL vs. OCIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than OCIO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MFUL vs. OCIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

OCIO
OCIO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
OCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUL vs. OCIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFULOCIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

1.06

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

1.61

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.54

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.33

7.09

-3.76

MFUL vs. OCIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the OCIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUL and OCIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFULOCIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.06

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.61

-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between MFUL and OCIO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MFUL vs. OCIO - Dividend Comparison

MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than OCIO's 10.53% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.13%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
10.53%10.27%1.87%2.32%3.21%2.83%2.90%2.22%0.01%1.68%

Drawdowns

MFUL vs. OCIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum OCIO drawdown of -24.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and OCIO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MFULOCIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-24.21%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.77%

-8.58%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-4.99%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-4.51%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.86%

-0.80%

Volatility

MFUL vs. OCIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) is 1.89%, while ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that MFUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MFULOCIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

4.56%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

7.65%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

12.59%

-7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

10.51%

-6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

11.36%

-7.14%