MFUL vs. IYLD
MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) and IYLD (iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MFUL is actively managed, while IYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MFUL returned 4.66%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for IYLD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUL charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IYLD.
Performance
MFUL vs. IYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUL achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than IYLD's 4.72% return.
MFUL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYLD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
MFUL vs. IYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 2.90% | 4.51% | 5.36% | 2.24% | -12.46% | -1.61% |
IYLD iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.72% | 15.44% | 2.00% | 12.55% | -16.80% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUL and IYLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between MFUL and IYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUL vs. IYLD — Risk / Return Rank
MFUL
IYLD
MFUL vs. IYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFUL | IYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.75 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 10.57 | -3.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFUL vs. IYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum IYLD drawdown of -30.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and IYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUL | IYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -30.23% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -4.63% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.74% | -5.20% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.77% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -4.52% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 1.20% | -0.31% |
Volatility
MFUL vs. IYLD - Volatility Comparison
Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) at 1.43%. This indicates that MFUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUL | IYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 1.43% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.58% | 4.76% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 5.81% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 7.87% | -3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 9.56% | -5.27% |
MFUL vs. IYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUL vs. IYLD - Dividend Comparison
MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than IYLD's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYLD iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF | 4.62% | 4.72% | 5.32% | 5.76% | 5.45% | 3.47% | 4.38% | 5.25% | 5.78% | 4.22% | 4.84% | 5.26% |
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.02% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUL and IYLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUL has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to IYLD (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUL dropped -16.41% vs IYLD's -30.23%.
On 3-year performance, IYLD leads with 10.29% vs 4.66% for MFUL. On fees, IYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IYLD has performed better with a 10.29% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.
IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 3.02% for MFUL.
They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MFUL and 0.60% for IYLD.
IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUL and IYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer