MFUL vs. GAA
Compare and contrast key facts about Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA).
MFUL and GAA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFUL is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021. GAA is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Dec 9, 2014.
Performance
MFUL vs. GAA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFUL vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | -0.53% | 4.51% | 5.36% | 2.24% | -12.46% | -1.61% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.89% | 18.76% | 6.67% | 7.65% | -8.47% | -1.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUL achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 3.89% return.
MFUL
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 3.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAA
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFUL vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFUL vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank
MFUL
GAA
MFUL vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUL | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 1.90 | -1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.55 | -1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.86 | -1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 11.75 | -8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUL | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.90 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.60 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUL and GAA is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MFUL vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison
MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than GAA's 3.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF | 3.13% | 3.31% | 2.59% | 5.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.78% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
MFUL vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum GAA drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and GAA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUL | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -26.57% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.77% | -7.18% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -4.27% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -3.90% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.75% | -0.69% |
Volatility
MFUL vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) is 1.89%, while Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that MFUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFUL | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 4.33% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 7.20% | -4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.75% | 10.33% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.22% | 11.27% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.22% | 11.05% | -6.83% |