MFUL vs. BAMY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) and BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MFUL returned 6.12% vs 9.36% for BAMY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUL charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for BAMY.

Performance

MFUL vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUL achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's 1.36% return.

MFUL

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMY

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 1.09%
• 1Y: 9.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUL vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	2.90%	4.51%	5.36%	3.78%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.36%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUL and BAMY is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.76

The correlation between MFUL and BAMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MFUL vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 45
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 81
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUL vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFUL	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.09	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	3.01	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.44	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	3.79	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	16.90	-10.03

MFUL vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUL and BAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFUL vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUL drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUL and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFUL	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-6.03%	-10.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-2.48%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.20%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.38%	-0.52%	-8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.55%	+0.34%

Volatility

MFUL vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) at 0.89%. This indicates that MFUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFUL	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	0.89%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.58%	2.78%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22%	4.50%	-0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.29%	5.98%	-1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.29%	5.98%	-1.69%

MFUL vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUL has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFUL vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

MFUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than BAMY's 7.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.57%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%	0.00%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.02%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFUL and BAMY in my portfolio?

MFUL and BAMY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFUL or BAMY?

MFUL has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to BAMY (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUL dropped -16.41% vs BAMY's -6.03%.

Which ETF is better, MFUL or BAMY?

On 1-year performance, BAMY leads with 9.36% vs 6.12% for MFUL. On fees, MFUL is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, BAMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFUL or BAMY?

Over the 1-year period, BAMY has performed better with a 9.36% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFUL or BAMY?

MFUL is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFUL or BAMY?

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 3.02% for MFUL.

What is the main difference between MFUL and BAMY?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for MFUL and 1.48% for BAMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.