PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTNX vs. EQCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MFTNX

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.57%
6M
23.08%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
6.55%

EQCHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
17.57%9.44%7.12%-13.65%58.30%2.37%-3.92%15.70%-19.56%19.38%
EQCHX
AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I
0.83%-8.09%-3.79%-8.07%20.13%12.28%6.96%-2.56%-12.91%15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTNX and EQCHX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2012

0.61

The correlation between MFTNX and EQCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTNX vs. EQCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTNX
MFTNX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EQCHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFTNXEQCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFTNXEQCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

Drawdowns

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTNXEQCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

Volatility

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTNXEQCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.08%

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTNX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than EQCHX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTNX vs. EQCHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFTNX nor EQCHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQCHX
AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%0.62%1.82%1.54%20.40%0.00%3.86%1.18%0.00%0.00%1.34%
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.69%40.52%2.53%0.00%20.10%8.43%2.28%9.35%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTNX and EQCHX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTNX and EQCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer