PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTNX vs. AHLPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTNX achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than AHLPX's 9.66% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTNX has outperformed AHLPX with an annualized return of 5.04%, while AHLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.36% annualized return.


MFTNX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.29%
6M
-0.44%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
38.82%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
5.04%
ALL TIME*
3.96%

AHLPX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.68%
6M
2.61%
YTD
9.66%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
4.36%
ALL TIME*
3.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
9.11%9.44%7.12%-13.65%58.30%2.37%-3.92%15.70%-19.56%19.38%
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
9.66%2.19%1.74%-4.20%16.48%4.67%10.36%0.09%2.15%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTNX and AHLPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.69

The correlation between MFTNX and AHLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTNX vs. AHLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFTNX
MFTNX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MFTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AHLPX
AHLPX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AHLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFTNXAHLPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

7.75

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

18.72

-8.64

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the AHLPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTNX and AHLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTNX drawdown since its inception was -35.58%, which is greater than AHLPX's maximum drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTNX and AHLPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTNXAHLPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.58%

-21.90%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-3.50%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.45%

-21.90%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.45%

-21.90%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-21.90%

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-2.94%

-4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-6.70%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

1.45%

+2.47%

Volatility

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) at 2.62%. This indicates that MFTNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTNXAHLPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

2.62%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

6.85%

+4.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

10.76%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.79%

9.68%

+12.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

9.55%

+12.46%

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTNX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than AHLPX's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTNX vs. AHLPX - Dividend Comparison

MFTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AHLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLPX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.36%8.07%0.29%0.63%17.64%7.15%5.14%4.17%1.45%4.07%0.00%3.40%
MFTNX
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.69%40.52%2.53%0.00%20.10%8.43%2.28%9.35%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTNX and AHLPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTNX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to AHLPX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTNX dropped -35.58% vs AHLPX's -21.90%.

AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTNX and AHLPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer