PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTFX vs. PUDZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than PUDZX's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTFX has underperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 6.32%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.


MFTFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.76%
YTD
17.32%
6M
22.95%
1Y
44.18%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
6.32%

PUDZX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
12.74%
6M
12.56%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
6.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
17.32%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
12.74%13.40%8.61%3.26%-2.76%18.49%4.84%16.29%-9.20%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTFX and PUDZX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.12

Over the past year, MFTFX and PUDZX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTFX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PUDZX
PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFTFXPUDZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.53

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

6.00

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.93

22.02

-9.09

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTFX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFTFXPUDZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.85

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.71

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.54

-0.35

Drawdowns

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and PUDZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTFXPUDZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-21.53%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-3.56%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-8.20%

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-17.98%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-21.53%

-14.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-2.37%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-5.26%

-11.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

0.97%

+2.52%

Volatility

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.05%. This indicates that MFTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTFXPUDZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

2.05%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

6.08%

+6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

7.49%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

10.53%

+11.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

9.70%

+12.44%

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTFX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PUDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
7.75%8.93%6.67%3.66%9.10%13.00%4.94%3.40%2.14%2.10%1.39%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTFX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTFX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to PUDZX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTFX and PUDZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer