MFTFX vs. PQTPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX).
MFTFX is managed by Arrow Funds. It was launched on Apr 28, 2010. PQTPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013.
Performance
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund | 6.05% | 9.29% | 6.87% | -13.57% | 57.88% | 2.13% | -4.13% | 15.17% | -19.70% | 19.09% |
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 3.86% | 2.41% | -3.08% | -4.21% | 11.37% | 14.83% | 9.72% | 2.83% | 2.30% | 2.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than PQTPX's 3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTFX has outperformed PQTPX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while PQTPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.67% annualized return.
MFTFX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 22.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
PQTPX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 1.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTPX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFTFX vs. PQTPX — Risk / Return Rank
MFTFX
PQTPX
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFTFX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.78 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.41 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 3.42 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFTFX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.39 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFTFX and PQTPX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MFTFX nor PQTPX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFTFX Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 41.04% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 20.00% | 7.84% | 2.12% | 9.36% | 1.21% |
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.80% | 2.40% | 5.63% | 2.49% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than PQTPX's maximum drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and PQTPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFTFX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.70% | -27.86% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -8.02% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.57% | -27.86% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.70% | -27.86% | -7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -13.32% | +5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.14% | -9.37% | -7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 3.31% | +1.87% |
Volatility
MFTFX vs. PQTPX - Volatility Comparison
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) at 3.63%. This indicates that MFTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFTFX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 3.63% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.24% | 6.73% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 8.75% | +12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 9.87% | +12.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 9.36% | +12.77% |