PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTFX vs. DWAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 17.48% return, which is significantly higher than DWAFX's 13.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MFTFX having a 6.34% annualized return and DWAFX not far ahead at 6.56%.


MFTFX

1D
0.70%
1M
3.90%
YTD
17.48%
6M
23.33%
1Y
45.25%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
6.34%

DWAFX

1D
0.91%
1M
2.78%
YTD
13.18%
6M
15.36%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
6.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
17.48%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%
DWAFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund
13.18%15.86%5.79%1.26%-5.30%4.68%21.10%10.89%-10.01%12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTFX and DWAFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.29

Over the past year, MFTFX and DWAFX have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTFX vs. DWAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAFX
DWAFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DWAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFTFXDWAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.66

4.18

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

15.84

-2.77

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the DWAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTFX and DWAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFTFXDWAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.52

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.47

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.66

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.42

-0.23

Drawdowns

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, roughly equal to the maximum DWAFX drawdown of -36.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and DWAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTFXDWAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-36.11%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-6.89%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-12.92%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-14.26%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-18.39%

-17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.99%

-7.10%

-9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.81%

+1.68%

Volatility

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX) at 3.53%. This indicates that MFTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTFXDWAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.53%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

9.48%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.61%

11.44%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

11.01%

+11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

9.96%

+12.18%

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAFX's 1.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Dividend Comparison

MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund
11.12%12.58%0.13%4.45%6.02%4.94%11.89%2.07%9.09%7.24%0.00%5.70%
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTFX and DWAFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFTFX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to DWAFX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs DWAFX's -36.11%.

DWAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTFX and DWAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer