PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFTFX vs. DWAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFTFX achieves a 13.40% return, which is significantly higher than DWAFX's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MFTFX has underperformed DWAFX with an annualized return of 5.30%, while DWAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.35% annualized return.


MFTFX

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
13.40%
6M
12.85%
1Y
46.72%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
5.30%

DWAFX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
10.03%
6M
8.80%
1Y
24.43%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
6.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
13.40%9.29%6.87%-13.57%57.88%2.13%-4.13%15.17%-19.70%19.09%
DWAFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund
10.03%15.86%5.79%1.26%-5.30%4.68%21.10%10.89%-10.01%12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MFTFX and DWAFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

0.29

Over the past year, MFTFX and DWAFX have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFTFX vs. DWAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFTFX
MFTFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MFTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MFTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAFX
DWAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DWAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFTFXDWAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

3.67

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

12.99

+0.45

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the DWAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFTFX and DWAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFTFX drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, roughly equal to the maximum DWAFX drawdown of -36.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFTFX and DWAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFTFXDWAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-36.11%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-6.89%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.57%

-12.92%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-14.26%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-18.39%

-17.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-2.78%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-7.09%

-9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.94%

+1.55%

Volatility

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund (MFTFX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund (DWAFX) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFTFXDWAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.81%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

10.36%

+2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

12.17%

+6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

11.15%

+10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

10.05%

+12.09%

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFTFX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAFX's 1.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFTFX vs. DWAFX - Dividend Comparison

MFTFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Balanced Fund
11.44%12.58%0.13%4.45%6.02%4.94%11.89%2.07%9.09%7.24%0.00%5.70%
MFTFX
Arrow Managed Futures Stragegy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.75%41.04%2.30%0.00%20.00%7.84%2.12%9.36%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFTFX and DWAFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAFX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to MFTFX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFTFX dropped -35.70% vs DWAFX's -36.11%.

MFTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFTFX and DWAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer