PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSV vs. SEIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MFSV vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MFSV vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
1.12%13.63%-4.64%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
0.14%27.43%-4.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSV achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than SEIV's 0.14% return.


MFSV

1D
1.79%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
1.12%
6M
3.07%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEIV

1D
2.44%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
0.14%
6M
7.66%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MFSV vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MFSV vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSV
MFSV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIV
SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSV vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFSVSEIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.66

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

2.33

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.42

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.50

12.08

-7.58

MFSV vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSV Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSV and SEIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFSVSEIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.66

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.98

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between MFSV and SEIV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MFSV vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than SEIV's 1.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
1.56%1.53%0.11%0.00%0.00%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.51%1.51%1.66%2.08%1.63%

Drawdowns

MFSV vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and SEIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSVSEIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.74%

-18.18%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-12.82%

+1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.66%

-4.68%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-3.60%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.57%

-0.13%

Volatility

MFSV vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is 3.72%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that MFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MFSVSEIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

4.49%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

9.49%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

18.25%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

16.82%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

16.82%

-2.65%