MFSV vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MFSV (MFS Active Value ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MFSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. MFSV is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, MFSV returned 14.91% vs 39.47% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MFSV charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

MFSV vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSV achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 43.86% return.

MFSV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 7.36%
• 6M: 6.12%
• 1Y: 14.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -4.23%
• 1M: -25.93%
• YTD: 43.86%
• 6M: 41.93%
• 1Y: 39.47%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 10.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSV vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF	7.36%	13.63%	-4.62%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	43.86%	-5.44%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSV and BNO is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	-0.06

The correlation between MFSV and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MFSV vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSV

MFSV Risk / Return Rank: 49
MFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
MFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 29
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSV vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFSV	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	0.97	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.51	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.20	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.23	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	4.18	+3.91

MFSV vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSV and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFSV vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSV drawdown since its inception was -12.74%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSV and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFSV	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.74%	-87.06%	+74.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-32.25%	+25.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-32.25%	+31.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-40.10%	+38.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	9.47%	-7.62%

Volatility

MFSV vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is 3.13%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that MFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFSV	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	11.33%	-8.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.82%	37.57%	-29.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	41.20%	-30.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.66%	35.70%	-22.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.66%	36.70%	-23.04%

MFSV vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSV has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFSV vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

MFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFSV MFS Active Value ETF	1.47%	1.53%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFSV and BNO in my portfolio?

MFSV and BNO have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFSV or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to MFSV (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSV dropped -12.74% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, MFSV or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 39.47% vs 14.91% for MFSV. On fees, MFSV is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, MFSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFSV or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 39.47% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFSV or BNO?

MFSV is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFSV or BNO?

MFSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between MFSV and BNO?

MFSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: MFS and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for MFSV and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.