MFSI vs. MIVL
MFSI (MFS Active International ETF) and MIVL (MFS Active International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from MFS. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFSI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for MIVL.
Performance
MFSI vs. MIVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MFSI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 15.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIVL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFSI vs. MIVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 0.15% |
MIVL MFS Active International Value ETF | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFSI and MIVL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFSI vs. MIVL — Risk / Return Rank
MFSI
MIVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFSI vs. MIVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and MFS Active International Value ETF (MIVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFSI | MIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFSI vs. MIVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, which is greater than MIVL's maximum drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and MIVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFSI | MIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -2.49% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.19% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -1.06% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | — | — |
Volatility
MFSI vs. MIVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFSI | MIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 13.86% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 13.86% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 13.86% | +2.48% |
MFSI vs. MIVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFSI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVL's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFSI vs. MIVL - Dividend Comparison
MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while MIVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MFSI MFS Active International ETF | 0.76% | 0.81% |
MIVL MFS Active International Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFSI and MIVL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIVL is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIVL is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MFSI.
MFSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for MIVL.
Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MFSI and 0.57% for MIVL.
Find the right allocation for MFSI and MIVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer