PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSI vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFSI vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSI achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


MFSI

1D
-1.16%
1M
5.04%
YTD
6.73%
6M
9.01%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFSI vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
6.73%26.43%-4.21%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSI and DBO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024

-0.17

The correlation between MFSI and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFSI vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFSI
MFSI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFSI vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFSIDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.44

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

9.02

-3.14

MFSI vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSI and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFSIDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.34

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.02

+1.14

Drawdowns

MFSI vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSI drawdown since its inception was -13.67%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSI and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSIDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.67%

-90.18%

+76.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-18.19%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-51.38%

+50.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-62.25%

+60.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

8.92%

-5.94%

Volatility

MFSI vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) is 4.72%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that MFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFSIDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

12.61%

-7.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

28.20%

-16.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

34.46%

-19.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

32.29%

-15.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

31.78%

-15.46%

MFSI vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFSI vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

MFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
0.76%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFSI and DBO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to MFSI (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSI dropped -13.67% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 17.49% for MFSI. On fees, MFSI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 17.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFSI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.76% for MFSI.

MFSI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: MFS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MFSI and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFSI and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer