PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFSG vs. MFSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFSG vs. MFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) and MFS Active International ETF (MFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFSG achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than MFSI's 9.70% return.


MFSG

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.11%
6M
4.16%
YTD
3.45%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.79%

MFSI

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.78%
6M
7.40%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
21.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.55M$1.84M$2.29M
$6.35M$6.69M$6.66M

MFSG vs. MFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MFSG
MFS Active Growth ETF
3.45%14.51%-2.99%
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
9.70%26.43%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MFSG and MFSI is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.64

The correlation between MFSG and MFSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFSG vs. MFSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFSG
MFSG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MFSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSG Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MFSI
MFSI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFSG vs. MFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) and MFS Active International ETF (MFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFSGMFSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

1.80

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

6.83

-5.57

MFSG vs. MFSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFSG Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the MFSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFSG and MFSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFSG vs. MFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFSG drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, which is greater than MFSI's maximum drawdown of -13.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFSG and MFSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFSGMFSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-13.67%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.15%

-11.17%

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-0.23%

-4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-1.94%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

2.95%

+1.95%

Volatility

MFSG vs. MFSI - Volatility Comparison

MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to MFS Active International ETF (MFSI) at 4.42%. This indicates that MFSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFSGMFSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

4.42%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.61%

13.23%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

15.29%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.83%

16.33%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.83%

16.33%

+5.50%

MFSG vs. MFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MFSI's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFSG vs. MFSI - Dividend Comparison

MFSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than MFSI's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025
MFSG
MFS Active Growth ETF
0.07%0.08%
MFSI
MFS Active International ETF
0.75%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFSG and MFSI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFSG has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to MFSI (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFSG dropped -23.24% vs MFSI's -13.67%.

On 1-year performance, MFSI leads with 21.20% vs 8.76% for MFSG. On fees, MFSG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MFSI has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFSG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MFSI.

MFSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.07% for MFSG.

MFSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MFSI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFSG and 0.59% for MFSI.

MFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFSG and MFSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer