MFQTX vs. FSPGX
MFQTX (AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MFQTX returned 2.86%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFQTX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.
Performance
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFQTX achieves a -4.73% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 1.40% return.
MFQTX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -4.73%
- 6M
- -5.07%
- 1Y
- -10.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund | -4.73% | -1.59% | 23.14% | 22.81% | -21.08% | 17.63% | 8.44% | 28.37% | -3.66% | 18.28% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.40% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFQTX and FSPGX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MFQTX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFQTX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
MFQTX
FSPGX
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFQTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.18 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.01 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 3.28 | -4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFQTX drawdown since its inception was -57.67%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFQTX and FSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFQTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.67% | -32.66% | -25.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.00% | -16.17% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.60% | -23.32% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -32.66% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.12% | -6.98% | -9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -6.36% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 4.96% | +6.05% |
Volatility
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) is 4.41%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that MFQTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFQTX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 6.11% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 12.59% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 16.23% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 21.62% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 21.56% | -2.58% |
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFQTX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFQTX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
MFQTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.87% | 2.45% | 5.59% | 139.81% | 1.67% | 0.72% | 1.95% | 0.47% | 1.19% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFQTX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPGX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to MFQTX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFQTX dropped -57.67% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.
FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFQTX and FSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer