MFQTX vs. BLUEX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX).
MFQTX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Dec 18, 2000. BLUEX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jan 10, 1991.
Performance
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund | -10.95% | -1.59% | 23.14% | 22.81% | -21.08% | -48.86% | 8.44% | 28.37% | -3.66% | 18.28% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | -8.68% | 4.45% | 7.24% | 14.35% | -14.30% | 3.22% | 34.74% | 35.34% | -4.91% | 27.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFQTX achieves a -10.95% return, which is significantly lower than BLUEX's -8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MFQTX has underperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of -0.87%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.
MFQTX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- -10.95%
- 6M
- -19.26%
- 1Y
- -14.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- -13.02%
- 10Y*
- -0.87%
BLUEX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -8.68%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFQTX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFQTX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank
MFQTX
BLUEX
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFQTX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | -0.66 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | -0.89 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.89 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.69 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.95 | -2.40 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFQTX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.77 | -0.66 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.05 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | 0.57 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFQTX and BLUEX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison
MFQTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.87% | 2.45% | 5.59% | 7.22% | 1.67% | 0.72% | 1.95% | 0.47% | 1.19% | 0.57% |
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.29% | 0.03% | 11.84% | 27.20% | 25.43% | 13.71% | 13.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFQTX drawdown since its inception was -67.09%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFQTX and BLUEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFQTX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.09% | -54.27% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.00% | -12.19% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.09% | -21.87% | -45.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.09% | -29.06% | -38.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.07% | -10.58% | -42.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -13.39% | -5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 3.51% | +4.50% |
Volatility
MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.64%. This indicates that MFQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFQTX | BLUEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 3.64% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.63% | 7.31% | +7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 11.01% | +7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.24% | 10.50% | +20.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 16.57% | +9.45% |