MFQTX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFQTX (AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from AMG. Over the past 10 years, MFQTX returned 8.64%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for BLUEX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFQTX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFQTX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MFQTX has underperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 8.64%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.

MFQTX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: -4.07%
• 6M: -12.79%
• 1Y: -9.94%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 8.64%

BLUEX

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -6.58%
• 6M: -6.15%
• 1Y: -6.22%
• 3Y*: 3.42%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund	-4.07%	-1.59%	23.14%	22.81%	-21.08%	17.63%	8.44%	28.37%	-3.66%	18.28%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-6.58%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MFQTX and BLUEX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2000	0.88

The correlation between MFQTX and BLUEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MFQTX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFQTX

MFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 1
MFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFQTX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	-0.67	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.67	-0.88	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.90	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	-0.55	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	-1.37	+0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFQTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is comparable to the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFQTX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFQTX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.61	-0.67	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.03	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.57	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.49	-0.12

Drawdowns

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFQTX drawdown since its inception was -57.67%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFQTX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFQTX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.67%	-54.27%	-3.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.00%	-12.19%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.60%	-12.19%	-11.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.69%	-21.87%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.58%	-29.06%	-8.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.54%	-8.53%	-7.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.31%	-13.37%	+3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.38%	4.85%	+5.53%

Volatility

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund (MFQTX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.48%. This indicates that MFQTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFQTX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	3.48%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.96%	7.75%	+7.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	9.98%	+6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	10.62%	+7.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.98%	16.59%	+2.39%

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFQTX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFQTX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

MFQTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.33%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
MFQTX AMG Veritas Global Focus Fund	0.00%	0.00%	18.87%	2.45%	5.59%	139.81%	1.67%	0.72%	1.95%	0.47%	1.19%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFQTX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, MFQTX and BLUEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MFQTX or BLUEX?

MFQTX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to BLUEX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFQTX dropped -57.67% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.