MFIG vs. FPX
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFIG tracks the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index while FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for FPX.
Performance
MFIG vs. FPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than FPX's 18.28% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 39.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
MFIG vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 4.31% | -0.21% |
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 18.28% | -3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and FPX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
FPX
MFIG vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFIG | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum FPX drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and FPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -56.29% | +42.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -0.83% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -11.34% | +6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | FPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 23.10% | -6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 26.49% | -9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 24.28% | -7.70% |
MFIG vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison
MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and FPX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.57% for FPX.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and FPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer