MFIG vs. DRLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.

Performance

MFIG vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 31.26% return.

MFIG

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 6.47%
• YTD: 4.31%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRLL

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 31.26%
• 6M: 27.14%
• 1Y: 43.09%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	4.31%	-0.21%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	31.26%	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and DRLL is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	-0.32

Return for Risk

MFIG vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 55
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFIG	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.57	-0.04

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and DRLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFIG	DRLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-23.73%	+9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-8.10%	+5.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-8.02%	+3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFIG	DRLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.58%	22.34%	-5.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	23.76%	-7.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.58%	23.76%	-7.18%

MFIG vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFIG vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.33%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFIG and DRLL in my portfolio?

MFIG and DRLL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFIG or DRLL?

On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFIG or DRLL?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFIG or DRLL?

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

What is the main difference between MFIG and DRLL?

MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.41% for DRLL.