PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFIG vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFIG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


MFIG

1D
-0.13%
1M
-2.33%
6M
4.85%
YTD
2.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$110.73K$153.60K$228.83K

MFIG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
2.59%-0.09%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and DBO is -0.34, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025

-0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFIG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFIG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFIGDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

MFIG vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFIGDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-90.18%

+75.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-53.56%

+49.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-62.20%

+57.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

Volatility

MFIG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFIGDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

38.53%

-21.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

33.35%

-16.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

32.20%

-15.43%

MFIG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFIG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
MFIG
Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFIG and DBO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.

MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.78% for DBO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFIG and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer