PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFFIX vs. PDDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund (MFFIX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFFIX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than PDDDX's 5.76% return.


MFFIX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.26%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
11.19%

PDDDX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.38%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFFIX
MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund
10.54%16.35%13.21%16.81%-15.69%20.44%13.24%26.79%-7.94%20.67%
PDDDX
Prudential Day One 2020 Fund
5.76%10.40%15.97%9.52%-12.63%36.80%8.13%14.99%-4.65%10.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MFFIX and PDDDX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.89

The correlation between MFFIX and PDDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFFIX vs. PDDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFFIX
MFFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MFFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MFFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PDDDX
PDDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PDDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PDDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund (MFFIX) and Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFFIXPDDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.53

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.37

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

15.78

-4.44

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the PDDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFFIX and PDDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFFIXPDDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.70

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.80

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.82

-0.10

Drawdowns

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFFIX drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, which is greater than PDDDX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFFIX and PDDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFFIXPDDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-18.88%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-3.90%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.51%

-6.09%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.17%

-16.64%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-3.01%

-0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.83%

+1.12%

Volatility

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund (MFFIX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) at 1.59%. This indicates that MFFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFFIXPDDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

1.59%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

3.91%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

4.87%

+5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

13.75%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

11.37%

+3.58%

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFFIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PDDDX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFFIX vs. PDDDX - Dividend Comparison

MFFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than PDDDX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFFIX
MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund
6.84%7.56%4.81%3.51%6.38%9.06%2.37%4.34%3.88%3.10%3.90%1.76%
PDDDX
Prudential Day One 2020 Fund
3.83%4.05%19.73%3.22%8.41%28.05%1.91%3.76%3.05%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFFIX and PDDDX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFFIX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to PDDDX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFFIX dropped -32.80% vs PDDDX's -18.88%.

PDDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFFIX and PDDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer