PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFFIX vs. FHDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund (MFFIX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFFIX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than FHDDX's 14.04% return.


MFFIX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.26%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
11.19%

FHDDX

1D
0.71%
1M
5.48%
YTD
14.04%
6M
15.52%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MFFIX
MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund
10.54%16.35%13.21%16.81%-15.69%20.44%13.24%26.79%-12.59%
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
14.04%22.85%16.77%20.77%-18.91%16.49%18.00%26.74%-11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MFFIX and FHDDX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.97

The correlation between MFFIX and FHDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFFIX vs. FHDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFFIX
MFFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MFFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MFFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FHDDX
FHDDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FHDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund (MFFIX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFFIXFHDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.28

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

14.56

-3.23

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FHDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFFIX and FHDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFFIXFHDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.50

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.73

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.74

-0.01

Drawdowns

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFFIX drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FHDDX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFFIX and FHDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFFIXFHDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-31.34%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-9.70%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.51%

-15.50%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.17%

-27.68%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-5.85%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.18%

-0.23%

Volatility

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund (MFFIX) is 2.86%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that MFFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFFIXFHDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.22%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

10.45%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

12.75%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

15.13%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

16.92%

-1.97%

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFFIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHDDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFFIX vs. FHDDX - Dividend Comparison

MFFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than FHDDX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
3.30%2.49%5.24%2.04%6.20%8.33%4.63%3.09%3.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFFIX
MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund
6.84%7.56%4.81%3.51%6.38%9.06%2.37%4.34%3.88%3.10%3.90%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MFFIX and FHDDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHDDX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to MFFIX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFFIX dropped -32.80% vs FHDDX's -31.34%.

FHDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFFIX and FHDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer