PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEM vs. TJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEM vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.


MFEM

1D
-1.14%
1M
9.48%
YTD
31.49%
6M
33.22%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*

TJUN

1D
0.04%
1M
0.70%
YTD
5.26%
6M
6.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEM vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and TJUN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEM vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM
MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEM vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFEMTJUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

MFEM vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFEMTJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

2.49

-2.05

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and TJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEMTJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.32%

-4.47%

-38.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

0.00%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-0.60%

-10.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

Volatility

MFEM vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEMTJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

7.55%

+11.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

7.55%

+9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

7.55%

+11.85%

MFEM vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEM vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.12%2.77%5.89%4.01%7.01%29.96%1.70%2.37%1.18%0.21%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEM and TJUN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

MFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

MFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFEM and 0.95% for TJUN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEM and TJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer