PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEM vs. SCHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEM vs. SCHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHE's 11.88% return.


MFEM

1D
-1.14%
1M
9.48%
YTD
31.49%
6M
33.22%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*

SCHE

1D
-1.45%
1M
2.69%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.88%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEM vs. SCHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
31.49%25.33%4.73%15.14%-19.50%10.77%11.33%15.26%-14.64%4.82%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
11.88%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEM and SCHE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.91

The correlation between MFEM and SCHE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFEM vs. SCHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFEM
SCHE

Technology

23.1%
30.8%

Financial Services

17.7%
13.6%

Basic Materials

15.1%
3.9%

Industrials

12.2%
4.9%

Energy

8.7%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
8.9%

Communication Services

4.8%
5.2%

Utilities

3.9%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
2.0%

Healthcare

1.7%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.0%

Technology

MFEM
23.1%
SCHE
30.8%

Financial Services

MFEM
17.7%
SCHE
13.6%

Basic Materials

MFEM
15.1%
SCHE
3.9%

Industrials

MFEM
12.2%
SCHE
4.9%

Energy

MFEM
8.7%
SCHE
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MFEM
8.3%
SCHE
8.9%

Communication Services

MFEM
4.8%
SCHE
5.2%

Utilities

MFEM
3.9%
SCHE
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

MFEM
3.5%
SCHE
2.0%

Healthcare

MFEM
1.7%
SCHE
2.8%

Real Estate

MFEM
1.1%
SCHE
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEM vs. SCHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEM
MFEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEM vs. SCHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFEMSCHEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.87

1.89

+0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

2.63

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.35

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

2.72

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.72

9.82

+5.90

MFEM vs. SCHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the SCHE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEM and SCHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFEMSCHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

1.89

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.28

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.25

+0.19

Drawdowns

MFEM vs. SCHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, which is greater than SCHE's maximum drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and SCHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEMSCHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.32%

-36.20%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-11.29%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-17.08%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-33.59%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-1.45%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-12.60%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.12%

+0.37%

Volatility

MFEM vs. SCHE - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) at 5.80%. This indicates that MFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEMSCHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

5.80%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

13.58%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

16.26%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

17.67%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

19.46%

-0.06%

MFEM vs. SCHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHE's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEM vs. SCHE - Dividend Comparison

MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SCHE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.12%2.77%5.89%4.01%7.01%29.96%1.70%2.37%1.18%0.21%0.00%0.00%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.57%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEM and SCHE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEM has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to SCHE (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEM dropped -43.32% vs SCHE's -36.20%.

On 5-year performance, MFEM leads with 8.84% vs 4.94% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFEM has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MFEM.

SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 2.12% for MFEM.

MFEM tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index, while SCHE tracks FTSE All-World Emerging. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MFEM and 0.11% for SCHE.

MFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEM and SCHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer