MFEM vs. FNDE
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE).
MFEM and FNDE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFEM is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. FNDE is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both MFEM and FNDE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MFEM or FNDE.
Correlation
The correlation between MFEM and FNDE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MFEM vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MFEM:
0.73
FNDE:
0.99
MFEM:
1.08
FNDE:
1.49
MFEM:
1.14
FNDE:
1.19
MFEM:
0.64
FNDE:
1.17
MFEM:
2.74
FNDE:
3.80
MFEM:
3.86%
FNDE:
4.51%
MFEM:
14.48%
FNDE:
17.22%
MFEM:
-42.28%
FNDE:
-43.55%
MFEM:
-8.64%
FNDE:
-10.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEM achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 12.29% return.
MFEM
6.05%
-1.19%
-1.35%
8.61%
4.06%
N/A
FNDE
12.29%
-1.70%
1.96%
14.78%
4.15%
5.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFEM vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MFEM vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MFEM vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
MFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than FNDE's 4.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 5.66% | 4.01% | 7.01% | 29.96% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 2.99% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 4.81% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.31% | 2.49% | 3.47% | 3.05% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% | 1.36% | 0.51% |
Drawdowns
MFEM vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEM and FNDE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MFEM vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) is 3.40%, while Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that MFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.