PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEGX vs. TILIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEGX achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly higher than TILIX's 3.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MFEGX having a 18.12% annualized return and TILIX not far ahead at 18.44%.


MFEGX

1D
-1.47%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
3.58%
6M
2.49%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*
18.12%

TILIX

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
3.15%
6M
1.82%
1Y
19.80%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEGX
MFS Growth Fund Class A
3.58%12.06%51.46%35.81%-31.31%23.28%36.29%37.35%2.04%30.52%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
3.15%18.41%33.31%42.64%-29.22%27.63%38.43%36.30%-1.66%28.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEGX and TILIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002

0.97

The correlation between MFEGX and TILIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEGX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEGX
MFEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MFEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TILIX
TILIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TILIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TILIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFEGXTILIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.31

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.63

4.27

-1.64

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the TILIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEGX and TILIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, which is greater than TILIX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEGX and TILIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEGXTILIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.42%

-50.54%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-16.24%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-23.33%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-32.68%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-32.68%

-3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-5.36%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-7.73%

-14.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

4.96%

+0.45%

Volatility

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) at 5.95%. This indicates that MFEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEGXTILIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

5.95%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

12.76%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

16.25%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.25%

21.59%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.43%

21.16%

+0.27%

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEGX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison

MFEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.30%, more than TILIX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEGX
MFS Growth Fund Class A
16.30%16.88%28.04%5.30%1.14%2.98%7.45%1.68%3.96%2.65%1.68%3.84%
TILIX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
4.28%4.41%3.25%1.90%11.00%8.76%1.91%2.38%4.01%0.68%1.33%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MFEGX and TILIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFEGX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to TILIX (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEGX dropped -72.42% vs TILIX's -50.54%.

TILIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEGX and TILIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer