MFEGX vs. PROVX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX).
MFEGX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000® Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 1986. PROVX is managed by Provident. It was launched on Dec 30, 1986.
Performance
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A | -13.67% | 12.06% | 51.46% | 35.81% | -31.31% | 23.28% | 36.29% | 37.35% | 2.04% | 30.52% |
PROVX Provident Trust Strategy Fund | -7.57% | 13.10% | 19.73% | 17.59% | -22.62% | 31.96% | 19.47% | 25.71% | -1.31% | 29.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEGX achieves a -13.67% return, which is significantly lower than PROVX's -7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEGX has outperformed PROVX with an annualized return of 15.75%, while PROVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.45% annualized return.
MFEGX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -13.67%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
PROVX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- YTD
- -7.57%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 8.59%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PROVX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFEGX vs. PROVX — Risk / Return Rank
MFEGX
PROVX
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFEGX | PROVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.29 | 0.69 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 1.14 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.14 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 2.43 | -1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFEGX | PROVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | 0.69 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.71 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.48 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEGX and PROVX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Dividend Comparison
MFEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.55%, more than PROVX's 18.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A | 19.55% | 16.88% | 28.04% | 5.30% | 1.14% | 2.98% | 7.45% | 1.68% | 3.96% | 2.65% | 1.68% | 3.84% |
PROVX Provident Trust Strategy Fund | 18.17% | 16.80% | 6.94% | 4.61% | 19.17% | 0.35% | 9.04% | 4.40% | 5.80% | 1.54% | 1.92% | 7.73% |
Drawdowns
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, which is greater than PROVX's maximum drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEGX and PROVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEGX | PROVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.42% | -57.65% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.39% | -12.54% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -27.48% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -27.48% | -8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.39% | -12.13% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -13.23% | -9.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 3.23% | +1.86% |
Volatility
MFEGX vs. PROVX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX) at 3.30%. This indicates that MFEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PROVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFEGX | PROVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 3.30% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 8.49% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 14.45% | +7.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 15.56% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 16.11% | +5.16% |