PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFEGX vs. PROVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFEGX achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than PROVX's 1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEGX has outperformed PROVX with an annualized return of 17.98%, while PROVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.69% annualized return.


MFEGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.82%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
26.91%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
17.98%

PROVX

1D
-1.23%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
1.91%
6M
1.62%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFEGX
MFS Growth Fund Class A
6.18%12.06%51.46%35.81%-31.31%23.28%36.29%37.35%2.04%30.52%
PROVX
Provident Trust Strategy Fund
1.91%13.10%19.73%17.59%-22.62%31.96%19.47%25.71%-1.31%29.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MFEGX and PROVX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 1993

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between MFEGX and PROVX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFEGX vs. PROVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFEGX
MFEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PROVX
PROVX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PROVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PROVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PROVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PROVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PROVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFEGXPROVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.47

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

2.32

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

5.11

-1.77

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the PROVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFEGX and PROVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFEGXPROVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.47

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.46

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.79

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.50

0.00

Drawdowns

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, which is greater than PROVX's maximum drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEGX and PROVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFEGXPROVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.42%

-57.65%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-12.54%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.28%

-15.92%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-27.48%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-27.48%

-8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-3.46%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.23%

-13.19%

-9.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

3.51%

+1.85%

Volatility

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Provident Trust Strategy Fund (PROVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that MFEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PROVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFEGXPROVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.68%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

9.56%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

12.26%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.11%

15.67%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

16.19%

+5.16%

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFEGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PROVX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFEGX vs. PROVX - Dividend Comparison

MFEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.90%, less than PROVX's 16.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEGX
MFS Growth Fund Class A
15.90%16.88%28.04%5.30%1.14%2.98%7.45%1.68%3.96%2.65%1.68%3.84%
PROVX
Provident Trust Strategy Fund
16.48%16.80%6.94%4.61%19.17%0.35%9.04%4.40%5.80%1.54%1.92%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFEGX and PROVX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEGX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to PROVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFEGX dropped -72.42% vs PROVX's -57.65%.

PROVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFEGX and PROVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer