MFEGX vs. GXXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX).
MFEGX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000® Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 29, 1986. GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A | -10.37% | 12.06% | 51.46% | 35.81% | -31.31% | 23.28% | 36.29% | 37.35% | 2.04% | 30.52% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -7.53% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFEGX achieves a -10.37% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's -7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MFEGX has outperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 16.19%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.
MFEGX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- 1Y
- 9.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
GXXIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFEGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFEGX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
MFEGX
GXXIX
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFEGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.19 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.40 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.05 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.31 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 1.15 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFEGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.19 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.34 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.56 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFEGX and GXXIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
MFEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, more than GXXIX's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A | 18.83% | 16.88% | 28.04% | 5.30% | 1.14% | 2.98% | 7.45% | 1.68% | 3.96% | 2.65% | 1.68% | 3.84% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.48% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.42%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFEGX and GXXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFEGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.42% | -33.65% | -38.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.39% | -11.78% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -33.65% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -33.65% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.23% | -10.87% | -3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -6.20% | -16.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 3.14% | +2.03% |
Volatility
MFEGX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.97% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 5.20%. This indicates that MFEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFEGX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.97% | 5.20% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 9.27% | +3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 16.73% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 27.78% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 23.72% | -2.42% |