MFC vs. IEMG
MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) is a stock, while IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Over the past 10 years, MFC returned 15.18%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for IEMG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MFC vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFC achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 24.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MFC has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 15.18%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.
MFC
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- 32.15%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
IEMG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 24.98%
- 6M
- 27.43%
- 1Y
- 49.24%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
MFC vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 8.17% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 24.98% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFC and IEMG is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MFC and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFC vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
MFC
IEMG
MFC vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFC | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.74 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 14.39 | -8.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFC | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.55 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.40 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.51 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.35 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
MFC vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFC drawdown since its inception was -83.61%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFC | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.61% | -38.71% | -44.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -13.21% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -17.21% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -35.83% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.44% | -38.71% | -18.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -2.30% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.42% | -12.97% | -16.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 3.43% | +1.20% |
Volatility
MFC vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) have volatilities of 8.05% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFC | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 8.24% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 16.97% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 19.47% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 18.38% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.42% | 20.03% | +8.39% |
Dividends
MFC vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
MFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than IEMG's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.20% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.47% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFC and IEMG have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to MFC (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFC dropped -83.61% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFC and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer