PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MFC.TO (Manulife Financial Corporation) is a stock, while XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, MFC.TO returned 23.66%/yr vs 17.21%/yr for XDIV.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFC.TO achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 21.85% return.

MFC.TO

1D
1.53%
1M
9.90%
YTD
15.19%
6M
17.52%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
35.54%
5Y*
23.66%
10Y*
17.33%

XDIV.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
4.75%
YTD
21.85%
6M
20.22%
1Y
40.47%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFC.TO
Manulife Financial Corporation		15.19%17.45%57.53%28.33%5.83%11.57%-9.19%41.99%-23.25%10.48%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		21.85%25.04%19.84%11.95%0.49%33.31%-7.53%25.14%-9.81%8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MFC.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.69

The correlation between MFC.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Manulife Financial Corporation

iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF

Often compared with MFC.TO:
MFC.TO vs. SLF.TOMFC.TO vs. GWO.TOMFC.TO vs. MFCMFC.TO vs. POW.TOMFC.TO vs. BNS.TOMFC.TO vs. IAG.TOMFC.TO vs. VDY.TO
Often compared with XDIV.TO:
XDIV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDIV.TO vs. XDV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDIV.TO vs. HDIV.TOXDIV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDIV.TO vs. CDZ.TO

Return for Risk

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MFC.TO
MFC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MFC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MFC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MFC.TOXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.71
5.14

-3.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.19
7.59

-5.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.07

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

17.55

-14.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

59.35

-50.70

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFC.TO and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.97%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFC.TO and XDIV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MFC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.97%

-41.29%

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.71%

-2.32%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.63%

-10.53%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-17.33%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.68%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-4.39%

-23.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

0.69%

+3.27%

Volatility

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that MFC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MFC.TOXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

2.47%

+5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

6.45%

+8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

7.95%

+11.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.55%

10.51%

+11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

16.33%

+9.76%

Dividends

MFC.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

MFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, which matches XDIV.TO's 3.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFC.TO
Manulife Financial Corporation		3.28%3.53%3.62%4.99%5.47%4.85%4.94%3.79%4.70%3.13%3.09%2.39%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF		3.25%3.90%4.50%4.42%4.15%3.76%4.85%4.24%5.13%1.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

MFC.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFC.TO and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer