PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUG.L achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPOL.L's 15.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEUG.L having a 10.37% annualized return and SPOL.L not far behind at 10.28%.


MEUG.L

1D
0.49%
1M
3.47%
YTD
6.45%
6M
8.77%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.37%

SPOL.L

1D
0.64%
1M
6.57%
YTD
15.71%
6M
25.23%
1Y
43.43%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUG.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR
6.45%26.01%3.67%12.42%-3.12%15.71%2.31%20.16%-9.59%15.90%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
15.71%61.27%-4.98%41.52%-17.96%8.30%-14.19%-9.68%-7.69%40.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUG.L and SPOL.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.38

The correlation between MEUG.L and SPOL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (5 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUG.L
MEUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MEUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOL.L
SPOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUG.LSPOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

4.54

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

10.87

-4.42

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SPOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUG.L and SPOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUG.LSPOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.87

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.55

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.40

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.16

+0.65

Drawdowns

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum SPOL.L drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUG.L and SPOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUG.LSPOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-56.64%

+28.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-9.51%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-19.47%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-46.27%

+31.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

-56.64%

+28.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-0.53%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-21.79%

+17.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.98%

-1.02%

Volatility

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) is 3.82%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPOL.L) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that MEUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUG.LSPOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

7.21%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

17.30%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

23.13%

-11.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

27.10%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

25.42%

-6.03%

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPOL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEUG.L vs. SPOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUG.L nor SPOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEUG.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.70%3.42%3.73%3.07%3.39%3.60%
SPOL.L
iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEUG.L and SPOL.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEUG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for SPOL.L.

MEUG.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SPOL.L tracks MSCI Poland NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MEUG.L and 0.74% for SPOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUG.L and SPOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer