PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MEUG.L having a 6.45% return and CEUR.L slightly higher at 6.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEUG.L having a 10.37% annualized return and CEUR.L not far behind at 9.88%.


MEUG.L

1D
0.49%
1M
3.47%
YTD
6.45%
6M
8.77%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.37%

CEUR.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.94%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.98%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
13.68%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUG.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR
6.45%26.01%3.67%12.42%-3.12%15.71%2.31%20.16%-9.59%15.90%
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
6.66%24.46%4.90%12.93%-5.96%17.02%2.29%19.59%-9.49%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUG.L and CEUR.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.61

Over the past year, MEUG.L and CEUR.L have become more correlated (0.97) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUG.L
MEUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MEUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CEUR.L
CEUR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUG.LCEUR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.74

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

6.06

+0.39

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CEUR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUG.L and CEUR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUG.LCEUR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.68

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.66

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.56

+0.25

Drawdowns

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, roughly equal to the maximum CEUR.L drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUG.L and CEUR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUG.LCEUR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-28.63%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-11.05%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-12.66%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-17.85%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

-28.63%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.52%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.58%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.17%

-0.21%

Volatility

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) is 3.82%, while Amundi MSCI Europe (CEUR.L) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that MEUG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEUR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUG.LCEUR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.25%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

10.53%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

12.44%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

13.88%

+5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

14.97%

+4.42%

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEUG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CEUR.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUG.L vs. CEUR.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEUG.L nor CEUR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEUR.L
Amundi MSCI Europe
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEUG.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.70%3.42%3.73%3.07%3.39%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MEUG.L and CEUR.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEUR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MEUG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MEUG.L and 0.05% for CEUR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUG.L and CEUR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer