PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MEUG.L is traded in GBp, while FLXD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEUG.L achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.


MEUG.L

1D
0.49%
1M
3.47%
YTD
6.45%
6M
8.77%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.37%

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEUG.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR
6.45%26.01%3.67%12.42%-3.12%15.71%2.31%20.16%-9.59%1.65%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-11.21%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between MEUG.L and FLXD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.54

The correlation between MEUG.L and FLXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (5 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEUG.L
MEUG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MEUG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEUG.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

5.64

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

15.75

-9.30

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEUG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEUG.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEUG.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.40

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

1.21

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.64

+0.17

Drawdowns

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEUG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEUG.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEUG.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-29.71%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-3.62%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-7.78%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-11.76%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.77%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.13%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.30%

+1.66%

Volatility

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR (MEUG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that MEUG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEUG.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.67%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

6.95%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

8.52%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

10.85%

+8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

12.91%

+6.48%

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MEUG.L and FLXD.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MEUG.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

MEUG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEUG.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI Europe D-EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.70%3.42%3.73%3.07%3.39%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEUG.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEUG.L and FLXD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

MEUG.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEUG.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer