METY.L vs. SMH3.L
METY.L (IncomeShares META Options ETP) and SMH3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - METY.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while SMH3.L is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, METY.L returned -23.21% vs 880.57% for SMH3.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SMH3.L.
Performance
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METY.L achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than SMH3.L's 303.42% return.
METY.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 6M
- -16.59%
- 1Y
- -23.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH3.L
- 1D
- -6.35%
- 1M
- 60.99%
- YTD
- 303.42%
- 6M
- 298.19%
- 1Y
- 880.57%
- 3Y*
- 160.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | -18.12% | 6.34% | 4.47% |
SMH3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities | 303.42% | 74.67% | -13.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between METY.L and SMH3.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METY.L vs. SMH3.L — Risk / Return Rank
METY.L
SMH3.L
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METY.L | SMH3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.60 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 22.21 | -22.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 72.90 | -74.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METY.L | SMH3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 | 9.41 | -10.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | 0.52 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METY.L drawdown since its inception was -39.94%, smaller than the maximum SMH3.L drawdown of -89.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METY.L and SMH3.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METY.L | SMH3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.94% | -89.37% | +49.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.94% | -39.25% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.46% | -6.35% | -26.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -48.37% | +34.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.02% | 11.98% | +9.04% |
Volatility
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares META Options ETP (METY.L) is 7.07%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities (SMH3.L) has a volatility of 39.31%. This indicates that METY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METY.L | SMH3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 39.31% | -32.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 71.15% | -48.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.19% | 92.66% | -63.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 101.12% | -70.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 101.12% | -70.73% |
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
METY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
METY.L vs. SMH3.L - Dividend Comparison
METY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.81%, while SMH3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METY.L IncomeShares META Options ETP | 18.81% | 19.94% | 3.15% |
SMH3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Semiconductors ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METY.L and SMH3.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METY.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METY.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SMH3.L.
METY.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMH3.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for METY.L and 0.75% for SMH3.L.
Find the right allocation for METY.L and SMH3.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer